About Me

Name: Rajjpuut's Folly
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

7 Golden Rules of Health

 

The Seven Golden Rules of Health

Interested in adding 35 years of high quality living to your lifespan? 
Here's how, and here's WOW!
 
If anything beside the spendthrifts in Washington, D.C., can derail the American Dream, it's the ever increasing cost of health care both to the nation at large and to the individual.  Roughly 72% of the price of a new American automobile is tied up in employee salary and benefits, especially health care.  In a very real sense, good health is a very personal matter . . . as the "Spider Man" movies remind us:  "With great power comes great responsibility,"  and you, the individual, certainly wield immense power in the battle for your own health, fitness, longevity and in avoiding high health care costs.
 
While working as a health educator for Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas in 1977, I read about a recently-completed long-range study of vigorous older people.  The gist of it all came to this:  the University of California (Berkeley campus, I believe) extracted seven lifestyle practices that these hardy senior citizens tended to share as a group.  As for the study results, here's what those salubrious old folks had in common:
 
The Seven Golden Rules of Health
 
1.  Eat a very large healthy breakfast daily
2.  Regularly eat 3-4 smaller meals daily
3.  Maintain a healthy normal weight
4.  Avoid tobacco and drug use (and minimize over-the-counter remedies)
5.  Drink alcohol extremely moderately
6.  Sleep 7-8 hours nightly
7.  Practice regular vigorous exercise
 
The "magic" from the study came when UC extrapolated their finding out into the general populace.  They discovered that if they took two men, one aged 55 years old and the other 20 and compared their lifestyles . . . if the 20 year old practiced 0-1 of the "Seven Golden Rules" and the 55 year old practiced 6-7 of them:  the two men had the exact same life expectancy.  That is, it would be absolutely no surprise at all if they both dropped dead on the same day, say 28.2 years in the future.  I'm not sure what that means to you, but the 35 years difference between the two men is my personal definition of "quality of life."
 
Further studies by other groups have shown that when it comes to changes made before age 42, once the individual starts to practice the Seven Golden Rules . . . within eight years most of the harm from the prior twenty years of a dissipate lifestyle is gone.  That means, for example, quit smoking and follow the seven golden rules for eight years, and it's almost as if you've never smoked a day in your life.  Benefits from lifestyle changes after age 42, were less consistent but still quite significant.
 
A few comments are in order.  Buckling seatbelts was a fairly new idea at the time of the study.  If an eighth and ninth golden rule are needed which I would add from my experience as a health educator, they would be:
 
8.  Buckle-up in moving vehicles and always observe proper caution around machinery
9.  Avoid highly processed foods and fried foods and eat some high-fiber food daily
 
Rule #5 "Drink alcohol extremely moderately" deserves some discussion.  After a brief flirtation with boozing as a youngster, I myself rarely consume a six-pack a month these days, so that's what I practice and preach.  However, in the actual study the amount of liquor mentioned was "averaging one beer or glass of wine per day."  Over the years since the study, much has been made of the value of red wine in the diet.  All this implies that a little bit of alcohol is preferable to none at all.  If there is one area of the study that I would put in question it would be that conclusion.  Here's my "take" on the matter.  The trouble with saying that teetotalers are less healthy than extremely moderate drinkers comes in two areas:  A) a whole lot of teetotalers are reformed alcoholics who in many cases regrettably did great damage to their health prior to quitting drinking altogether and presumably shortened their probable lifespans in the process.  It is my intuition that IF the study had eliminated this effect from former alcoholics in its study, their fifth rule should have been:  "Rule #5 "Drink alcohol extremely moderately or not at all."  Additionally, from my experience I suspect that there are "overly pious personalities" out there who don't drink and resent everybody in the world who does . . . and in fact they deeply resent almost everybody in the world for any number of reasons.  If they were removed from the rolls of non-drinkers, I'm sure the non-drinkers would have averaged a longer life also.  So my last addition to the Golden Rules of Health is:
 
Rule #6 7/8  Have a sense of humor, relax
 
If on top of all this great advice, the individual, let us call him "Bill" takes charge of his own health and finds a health-conscious (rather than disease-oriented) doctor "muy simpatico" who believes that the purpose of wise medicine is to keep people hale-healthy and out of his office . . .  and if Bill always seeks at least a second opinion in considering serious health care matters, then he and his doctors are part of the solution to the health care mess rather than part of problem.  If every company had a full roster of employees like Bill then health care costs and costs across the board would drop markedly starting now.
 
Live long, strong and ornery,

Bob

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hiccup Phobia

 

The Hiccup Parable

 
 
              This blog is a serious commentary. Clearly everyone knows that hiccups are a very trivial matter. Certainly hiccups do NOT rank in importance with all those supremely crucial matters to which any erudite blog is normally dedicated.  Accordingly, like the parables of Jesus in the New Testament, the hiccup will be introduced only to make a point about more serious matters, hak koff, koff.  

If you explored “hiccups” on the internet, you’d find tens of thousands of old wives’ cures and home remedies claiming to “stop hiccups.” One site I saw listed 250 such treatments. Of course, the very volume of all this speaks to ignorance. If you contract strep throat you go in and get a shot of antibiotics and barring a super-mutant strain of strep on steroids, that ends the problem. Not so with hiccups. 

 Ignorance truly is bliss sometimes, except, of course, when it is a curse. I was talking to a psychologist friend of mine the other day. He occasionally tells me about “creative treatments” for various little mental aberrations he sees from time to time and I give him the straight skinny on things like fitness and longevity from a health educator’s point of view.  On this day, James mentioned that three times in the last five years he’d encountered patients with a “hiccup phobia.” It seems that all three patients were already seeing him for relatively minor neuroses but had later become so obsessed with the possibility of developing “life-threatening hiccups” that full-blown phobias had developed. The case of American Charles Osborne who hiccupped from 1922 to 1990 documented among the world records and the sad case of a girl whose hics could be heard half a mile away seem to have struck a resonant chord with his clients and he told me his patients were not an isolated incident, but rather he and his colleagues had discussed several other such cases. 

Clearly the "Guinness Book of World Records" is a very dangerous reference. 
As resident know-it-all, I told him that because I was in possession of 100% effective knowledge about how to cure hiccups with 100% effectiveness, I thought that, imparting that knowledge for him to impart to his patients could immediately alleviate their fears:  case solved. He scoffed, as learned men are wont to do. “Don’t give me that crap, Bob, everybody has a pet way to cure hiccups. None of them work all the time.”

            I demurred, telling him, not only did I know how to clear up hiccups 100% effectively, but he did too. “Go on,” he said.

            Slyly, I recounted a case he'd told me about twenty-six or twenty-seven years ago.  “How would you treat a socialite who feared that her perspiration was obnoxious and had developed such a phobia of sweating in public that she truly suffered from an easily measurable excessive perspiration?” 

            He laughed, “No-brainer. I've seen a lot of similar cases.  We have her shower but apply no deodorant or anti-perspirant, then wear a sleeveless-backless gown and then she attends the next big function on her scedule.  She is to make every deliberate effort to “stink them all out” and pump out a river of sweat to drown everyone else at the party. When she emerges dry as the Sahara Desert, she’s cured.”

            “Hiccups are the same,” I claimed.

            “Son of a b____!” my learned friend said.

            And so it is.  Hiccups and perspiration, body temperature and chemical balances, pulse and digestion, respiration and salivation, eye blinks and toenail growth are all under the control of the autonomic nervous system. Left alone they are virtually infallible in carrying out their vital jobs well below the level of conscious effort, but try to control them for very long and you can do yourself a world of hurt because it’s “not nice to fool Mother Nature.”   

Despite my constant efforts, after detecting my first “hic,” to break Mr. Osborne’s world record . . . . I rarely get out a second one. When I do, then I pump my fist in the air a few times and yell, “Yes, yes, yes and strive powerfully for a quick string of five hics in a row. To date my personal record is a pathetic six hics in a row lasting perhaps 20 seconds. I am mightily ashamed I tell you. Now, you ask, “What in the world has that story got to do with anything?” What, indeed?

            As I mentioned earlier, hiccups certainly do NOT compare to weightier matters like the health care crisis, galloping socialism, inflation, the rape of the taxpayer, our new president’s interference in the free market, the rape of the taxpayer and the imminent inflation that’s been created, the choice of a shoot-from the hip judge as a Supreme Court nominee, the failure of today’s journalists to upheld their trust by keep the voting public informed through unbiased presentation of the facts of American life, etc., etc. However, perhaps we can apply the humble “Hiccup Parable” to each and everyone of those more serious subjects?

            Perhaps you would NOT be shocked to know that medical doctors here in the United States have occasionally treated “runaway” hiccups for weeks or even months at a time. The lesson that I would draw from that is to “never go where you don’t belong.” The lesson applies equally for doctors treating hiccups and presidents wasting obscene amounts of taxpayer money on bailouts instead of letting normal bankruptcies alleviate matters. What is the end result of the auto bailouts?

Two bankruptcies, in fact, if not in name, and $100 billion in taxpayer funds wasted. What would have been the result without Obamanomics . . . two bankruptcies and not one red cent of taxpayer monies wasted.  On a more humorous personal note, three decades after the original Chrysler bailout, Lee Iacocca, the former Chairman of Chrysler in 1979 who engineered that bailout, just lost much of his pension and benefits with the recent bankruptcy of the the firm.  Talk about poetic justice, it warms the very cockles of my heart and soul.

            Those same “hiccup” doctors, never fail to charge the patients they can’t cure and don’t cure for . . . office visits and examination fees and then, of course if and when nature takes its course and the patient loses the hiccups, would you be surprised if the doctor didn’t take credit for the cure? Doctor Barak is using the “tried and true methods of the New Deal today. The economy under Roosevelt didn’t cure itself until World War II brought an economic boom and all his interferences actually heavily prolonged the stock market panic into three separate stock market crashes. Despite the fact that the figures say the bottom of the Great Depression was mid-July, 1933, 140 days after FDR took office. Roosevelt’s Depression lasted roughly nine years. 

            If perchance, the medicines the doctor’s prescribe for hiccups bring about an adverse reaction . . . unlikely, you say. Ah, well . . . did you know that an American is ten times more likely to enter the hospital for an adverse reaction to prescribed medication than for an automobile accident? He is also four times more likely to die from that very same drug reaction than from injuries in a car crash.   Extending the parable into presidential policies again . . . Doctor Barak is prescribing medications for the country that are 100% likely to bankrupt future generation and debase the American dollar through runaway inflation. As you know, some cures are much worse than the underlying problem they’re prescribed for.

            Any politician like "Doctor" Nancy Pelosi who has not read and understood Leonard Read’s delightful little essay, “I, Pencil” is like an M.D. who has neither read nor understood the Hippocratic Oath (“First, do no harm!”) I invite all Americans to understand what makes the Free Market work and indeed, what makes civilized human societies and decency possible:
 
http://www.thefreemanonline.org/featured/i-pencil/
 
Live long, strong and ornery,

Bob

 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »